Акселераторы и гранты для стартапов

What Big-Company Startup Programmes Are Really For

Подписывайтесь на нас в Instagram

Every big-company startup programme is a customer acquisition tool wearing a founder-support costume, and that is not a criticism. Microsoft wants you on Azure before you can afford AWS. Google wants your model training on its cloud before you've shopped around. NVIDIA wants your inference stack built on CUDA before you've even benchmarked a competitor's chip. Microsoft for Startups Founders Hub hands out up to $150,000 in credits. Google for Startups Cloud Program goes up to $350,000 for AI-first seed to Series A companies. These are real dollars. They are also the cheapest customer acquisition cost these companies will ever pay for you.

The Trade You're Actually Making

A platform giving you free compute or credits now is betting that switching costs will keep you there once you're paying list price. That bet is usually correct, which is exactly why the programmes exist and why you should take them anyway. The question isn't whether to accept the trade. It's whether you know what you're trading before you sign.

What Six of These Programmes Actually Give You

  • Microsoft for Startups Founders Hub: up to $150,000 in Azure and startup credits, no cohort deadline to track.
  • Google for Startups Cloud Program: up to $350,000 in Cloud credits for AI-first companies at seed through Series A, $200,000 for other early-stage startups.
  • Google for Startups Accelerator: AI First Latin America: equity-free, Google product credits plus eligibility to apply for additional cash support.
  • Greylock Edge: $500K+ in credits, applications taken on a rolling basis so there is no deadline forcing a rushed application.
  • NVIDIA Inception: free cloud credits and preferred pricing on GPUs and software, no cash grant, rolling intake year round with no batch deadlines.
  • Techstars: $120,000, useful as the comparison point for what a cash-first, platform-agnostic programme looks like next to the credit-first ones above.
  • Plug and Play FinTech: corporate partnerships and investment access structured around a fixed calendar, Selection Day in February and August, Focus Week 1 in March and September, Focus Week 2 in April and October, EXPO in May and November.

The Lock-In Cost Nobody Prices In

Credits expire, but architecture decisions don't. If you build your data pipeline on Google's stack to use $350,000 of Cloud credits, migrating off it later costs engineering months you didn't budget for, not just a new vendor contract. The same applies to NVIDIA Inception's preferred GPU pricing: it's free and valuable, but every kernel you optimise for CUDA is a kernel you'd have to rewrite to run cheaper elsewhere. Nobody puts that line item in the pitch deck for the programme. You have to put it in yours.

How To Take The Credits Without Marrying The Platform

Use the credits for the expensive, throwaway work: load testing, training runs, burst compute for a launch spike. Don't build the core abstraction layer of your product directly against one vendor's proprietary APIs if you can route through an open standard instead, even if it costs a bit more engineering time up front. Greylock Edge's rolling application and NVIDIA Inception's year-round intake both mean you're not under deadline pressure to decide fast, so there's no excuse for skipping this step. Programmes with fixed calendars, like Plug and Play FinTech's cycle running from February Selection Day through the November EXPO, are a different animal: you're committing to a structured timeline of corporate exposure, not just claiming a credit balance, so read what happens at each stage before you apply.

When It's Worth It Anyway

If you're pre-revenue and compute is your biggest line item, $150,000 from Microsoft for Startups Founders Hub or $350,000 from Google for Startups Cloud Program is the difference between twelve months of runway and six. Take it. Just don't mistake a platform's generosity for neutrality. It isn't neutral. It was never meant to be.